Caboolture Hospital Emergency physician and lead researcher, Dr Simon Bugden, said the failure rate for IV lines in the first 48 hours was 29-40 per cent in Australia and as high as 90 per cent internationally. an introduction to efficient medical school interview question methods“We found that by using medical skin glue, we could reduce the failure rate to below 17 per cent,” Dr Bugden said. “The glue made IV lines harder to unintentionally remove and was also shown to kill the bacteria that most commonly cause infections. “The other major benefit was patient comfort, with patients in the trial reporting that the glue caused less irritation and they were less worried about the lines falling out. “Doctors place more than 10 million IV lines in Australia each year – and more than 300 million in the US – so reducing the need to replace IV lines will save staff time and free up valuable healthcare resources.” With funding from Queensland Health, EMF awarded a $50,000 grant for the research and patient trials, which ran over several months at Caboolture Hospital in Queensland. The research is currently undergoing a cost-benefit analysis by health economists at Griffith University, with a view to rolling out the new procedure on a wide scale. EMF Chair, Associate Professor Sally McCarthy, said the discovery was an example of how significant healthcare benefits could be achieved by funding front line emergency medicine research. “There has been no improvement to the current procedure of inserting and securing IV lines in several decades, despite the rate of failure,” A/Prof. McCarthy said. “Dr Bugden’s method could be simply and cost-effectively introduced in hospitals worldwide. “EMF is committed to ensuring Australia continues to stay at the forefront of emergency medicine care by funding to dedicated research in this field.” Dr Bugden’s research was recently published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-12/emf-mgi120516.php
There were no finished visual effects, but they remember thinking If this guy can pull this off, itll be amazing. [Edwards laughs] Has your process changed from the days when you were making tiny movies like that? Has having thousands of collaborators on a giant movie forced you to adjust your sensibilities? Obviously, with a film like that, you get a lot of great freedom in that you can be very organic. People would always say, if they were polite about that film, they would say, How did you make something reasonably good with so little money? http://www.buffalos-rufc.com/lukewoodnews/2016/08/07/his-arguments-were-that-the-districts-decision-to-terminate-his-contract-was-not-valid-because-of-the-lack-of-substantial-evidenceI think the opposite is true. How do you make something good with an insane amount of money? Because when theres a lot of pressure riding on something, when you have this really high budget stuff, it could potentially limit you. I found there are a lot of advantages to being on a small budget and having a small crew. You get some very intimate performances and naturalistic cinematography. And then you do a massive Hollywood film and its the other side of the spectrum.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.slashfilm.com/star-wars-rogue-one-gareth-edwards-interview/
You may also be interested to read
- like this
- official statement
- click this link here now